aka: Practicing what we preach.
When I first got interested in knowledge management (2002) I did a bit of research on the internet looking for methods, frameworks, theories and tools (some call them ‘recipes’).
What I ran into was a lot of “We have what you are looking for and are more than happy to do it for you for $X,XXX an hour/day.”
Now obviously there is the need for people to have a career and be paid for their services. But having come from a computer technology background I understood that knowledge could be openly shared and people could still get paid (a lot).
So after becoming aware of the the Cynefin and Cog Edge work and this being published under creative commons instead of copyright, I held a hope that there are KM people that actually practice what they preach. That is openly share what we know.
Now you may of may not agree with me but the way I see it is Dave and his posse have been developing techniques in the sensemaking space and improving on them.
So why can’t we do this with other aspects of sharing and using knowledge. Yes I’m aware of issues of IP and alike but I don’t see these raised in the forums we participate in both face-to-face and virtually.
So what if this was harnessed? There are a 1,001 ways to do it. What if we took what we try to do (successfully or otherwise) either at work or with our clients everyday, and proved that it can work in our own discipline?
There are fragments all over the place. In forums, books, blogs, white papers, articles, video, audio and of course in people. What if we did the unthinkable and all contributed to knowledge technology (this is using technology in it’s original form talking about knowledge of a technique)? How can we provide people with a map of what knowledge management could be? A body of knowledge.
I don’t even want to talk about computer technology (yet).
I don’t want to go near the IM/KM debate because it is not a debate. It is merely different perspectives. Though they may be different, they are still valid.
I am keen to here you thoughts on the validity of such an endeavor.